How Bobi Wine Pocketed 370M Shillings From Museveni!! Shocking Details Leak

After initially refuting claims that President Museveni granted him tax exemption for his bulletproof car following the 2021 general elections, Bobi Wine has further denied assertions of receiving a gratuity from parliament.

Through his social media platforms, Bobi Wine rebuffs the notion of receiving Shs370m and invites anyone with evidence to counter his denial.

Currently abroad for diplomatic duties, Bobi Wine recently stirred controversy by urging his Buganda Deputy President to step down as a parliamentary commissioner, citing a questionable payment of Shs500m labeled as a “Service Award.”

This payment’s legality and purpose have been challenged by Bobi Wine and NUP leaders. Amid mounting pressure on Mpuuga, his supporters suggest that Bobi Wine should also disclose any funds received from parliament.

Bobi Wine has refuted these claims and seeks to clarify his parliamentary income since his entry in 2017 through a Kyadondo East by-election.

Below is what Bobi Wine has to say about the Shs370m and publish this verbatim.

I have never received 370,000,000/= from Parliament, and I challenge anyone who says that to produce proof of the same.The only payment I received after leaving Parliament was out of the mandatory savings scheme, established by the Parliamentary Pensions Act, 2006.

Every month, Parliament deducts 15% off every MP’s salary under this savings scheme. The law mandates the government to also make a contribution. It is the equivalent of NSSF for other sectors, because MPs do not save under NSSF. So this is not a favor from anyone but a mandatory payment guaranteed by law.

It extends to every person who serves as Member of Parliament. Moreover, it is calculated based on the time you spend in Parliament, which is why I got much less than other MPs since I joined Parliament through a by-election.

Actually at that time, if you were not yet 45 years of age and had not been in Parliament for more than 5 years, you could not even opt to keep your savings there. (See Section 13 of the Act.)I hope this clarifies both matters.

The deliberate attempt to divert the population from seeking answers using false narratives and propaganda must be rejected and treated with contempt!.