“That Betty Nambooze Is Another Museveni, She Over Stayed In Power, Let Her Quit Elective Politics” Bobi Wine’s Blue Eyed Girl Sauda Madada Fearlessly Tells

Sauda Madada, often described as Bobi Wine’s blue-eyed girl, has stirred a heated political storm after openly criticizing longtime legislator Betty Nambooze. In a bold statement, Madada argued that Nambooze has remained in office for far too long, drawing parallels between her extended stay in parliament and President Museveni’s decades-long rule. She insisted that it is time for veteran politicians to step aside and allow new leaders to take charge, a position that has quickly gained traction among National Unity Platform (NUP) supporters.

The disagreement erupted after Nambooze questioned Madada’s decision to contest independently for the position of Woman Lord Councilor in Kampala Central. Nambooze accused the youthful politician of being motivated by the salary and benefits attached to the office, a claim that was met with swift and sharp resistance. Madada dismissed the remarks as both unfair and unfounded, making it clear that her political ambitions are rooted in service rather than personal gain.

In an interview with Sanyuka Television, Madada struck a defiant tone, flipping the accusation back at her critic. She remarked that Nambooze’s focus on salaries and privileges reveals more about her own political mindset than about Madada’s. “I don’t blame her when she says I am after the salary. She must be personally focused on that because it’s what she does. However, I am after serving my people,” Madada declared. The statement underscored her determination to be seen as a fresh, principled alternative to the old guard.

Madada’s criticism did not stop at defending herself. She went a step further, urging Nambooze to retire from elective politics altogether. According to Madada, the Mukono legislator has held onto power long enough, unfairly preventing others from leading. She likened Nambooze’s political career to that of President Museveni, warning that overstaying in leadership positions only stifles progress and breeds resentment.

The young aspirant went on to stress that leadership should never be treated as a lifetime occupation. In her view, two terms in office are more than sufficient for any politician to deliver meaningful change. Beyond that, leaders risk becoming entrenched careerists, clinging to their positions for personal gain rather than genuine service. Madada’s argument resonates strongly with the frustrations of many Ugandans who feel suffocated by leaders who refuse to give way to new energy and fresh ideas.

This war of words has exposed simmering tensions within NUP, where an emerging generation of leaders is challenging the dominance of seasoned politicians. The party, which champions the promise of change, now finds itself under pressure to reconcile its call for renewal with the reality of its internal power struggles. Madada’s defiance has not only unsettled her seniors but also earned her significant public and media attention as a fearless voice for generational change.

Whether Nambooze will heed Madada’s call or respond with equal force is still uncertain. What is evident, however, is that this confrontation has heightened the stakes in both NUP and Ugandan politics more broadly. For Madada, the battle goes beyond personal ambition—it represents a larger demand for fairness, fresh leadership, and a genuine break from the culture of political longevity that has long defined the country’s governance.